Local News :

Home   >   News   >   General News   >   201806
Experts Back Anas’ Methodology, But Lawyer Disagrees
 
<< Prev  |  Next >>
 
13-Jun-2018  
Comments ( 5 )     Email    Print
       
 
 
 
 
Related Stories
 
Two prominent personalities have justified the methods used by investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas in his undercover journalism work at a forum organised by the African Center for International Law and Accountability (ACILA).

The discussion on undercover journalism was under the theme ‘The ethics, public interest and the law’.

In the discussion, one of the panellists, Esther Armah, an international journalist for British Broadcast Corporation (BBC), who was in support of the method used by Anas, said journalists’ first obligation is to the truth, and their first loyalty is to the citizens.

Therefore, she argued that regardless of whatever length a journalist would go to uncover the truth, even if through subterfuge, public interest must be at the centre of your work. 

By supporting the methodology of the undercover journalist, she stated that “undercover should be the last resort after all means of getting the information has been exhausted”.

In addition, she defended Anas’ work as a means to uncover the truth. 
She explained further that before a journalist goes on to uncover a hidden truth, the journalist has to gather enough information pointing to a wrongdoing.

A lecturer at the Ghana Institute of Journalism (GIJ) and a Legal Practitioner, Zakaria Tanko Musah also said before an undercover journalist unravels a hidden truth, he must have some hints of corrupt practices, which must be of public interest.

A private legal practitioner, Nii Kpakpo Samoa Addo kicked against the method used by the undercover journalist to unearth wrongdoing in the society, citing breach of privacy to back his argument. 

Nii Kpakpo Addo is currently at the Economic Community of West Africa State (ECOWAS) Court as defence counsel for three judges who appeared in an exposé on the judiciary by the ace journalist.

The methodology used by Anas to unearth wrongdoing in the society is not the right way, he said. 

According to him, the use of hidden cameras and microphones to record the visuals and audios of a person of interest without the consent while inducing the person to perform the unlawful act is not right. 

He quoted Article 18 (2) of the 1992 Constitution to support his argument on breach of privacy. 
He said Anas’ method infringes on the privacy of people he uncovers. He records the individuals without their consent, which the law of the country frowns on. 

This debate was triggered by Anas’ latest exposé, dubbed ‘Number 12’, which was premiered at the Accra International Conference Centre on Wednesday, June 6, 2018. The exposé has caused an uproar in the country.
Other panellists said that if the methodology used by the journalist to unearth wrongdoing is analysed and accepted by the court, then he can continue using it.

Aside the discussion of the methodology of Anas’ work, there was also a launch of a fund to support investigative journalism in the country.

Former Commissioner for the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), Justice Emile Francis Short launched the fund. 

Justice Emile Francis Short said: “I’m a Human Right Activist but also an anti-corruptionist, and I support Anas’ methodology.”

The Executive Director of ACILA, William Nyarko introduced the organisation and how it deals with international human rights and rule of law issues. 

He further explained why their main focus is on investigative journalism.
He said, “Our organisation is an anti-corruption one, that’s why we have expressed interest in that field.”
 
 
 
Source: The Finder
 
 

Comments ( 5 ): Post Your Comments >>

 
 
 
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority.
 
 
COMMENTS




Name: asgil
even if Anas had planted the cameras and took real time cases of corruption, the law would talked about the issues of privacy. How much more about the investigator going to people and offering them bribe in a simulated manner and then video them. No one should support this evil method.
 
Name: Nii
My father-in-law wanted to find out if I can possibly cheat on his daughter so he arranged with his daughter's friend (Ms Jen) who is prettier than my wife to test me. My father-in-law one day sent me to Ms Jen's house to pick something for him. Ms Jen was nude when I got to her apartment with a pack of condoms in one hand and a bottle of champagne in other hand. Ms. Jen asked for a big favor - sex. I turned her down but how many Ghanaian men will turn this offer down? This is exactly what Anas is doing.
 
Name: A concerned citizen...[Correction]
{Both giver and taker are both guilty of corruption}
 
Name: A concerned citizen
Anas method is aiding and abetting of crime[ The giver and the taker is equally guilty}.Therefore Anas is doing something contrary to the laws of the land.[2] Parading jezebel women and money is evil. So Anas is using the tools of the devil to tempt people. Fighting corruption is a step in the right direction but 419 entrapment leave much to be desired. How come the BBC[Colonial masters} will not encourage Anas to entrap England FA or the British Prime Minister? Presumably, they using Anas to destroy Ghana and Africa. Corruption is everywhere in the World but countries will prefer solving their problem internally. Why not Anas taking the videos to court but showing it to the World to disgrace Ghana? The equation must be balanced just as Anas is investigating people he must also be investigated to see whether he is also clean. Therefore, Ghana needs the second independence from mental enslavement of Anas 'voodoo' under cover video. This Anas doctored video of mudslinging needs to addressed to avoid total disgrace in the international community.
 
Name: Obogaa
Who are the corrupt lawyers who disagree with Anas methods?
 



Post A Comment

Name:
   
Comment: