<<Print>>

In the realm of politics, it is often said that loyalty should be to the country first and foremost, rather than to any particular political party. This sentiment is at the heart of Alan Kyerematen's decision to run as an independent candidate, and it raises an important question: When a political party appears to be undemocratic or fails to serve the greater good, should one's allegiance still be unwavering?

Alan Kyerematen, a prominent figure in Ghanaian politics, has made a bold move by choosing to run as an independent candidate rather than as a member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), the party he has long been associated with. His decision challenges the conventional wisdom that party loyalty should always come first.

One of the fundamental principles of democracy is that political parties should be vehicles for representing the interests and will of the people. However, when a party begins to drift away from its core values or ceases to be a democratic institution, citizens are faced with a dilemma. Should they continue to support the party blindly, or should they consider alternative paths to uphold their principles and values?

Kyerematen's decision to run independently is a clear reflection of his belief that the country's interests should take precedence over party loyalty. It underscores the notion that citizens should be free to act in the best interests of their nation when they perceive a disconnect between their values and those of the party they once supported.

Critics argue that breaking away from a political party and running independently can be divisive and weaken the party's chances of success in an election. However, it can also serve as a powerful message that democracy should not be taken for granted. It reminds parties that they are accountable to their members and the public, and it encourages them to uphold democratic principles.

Furthermore, Kyerematen's decision highlights the importance of internal party democracy. If party members are systematically marginalized or their voices are stifled, it becomes increasingly difficult for the party to represent the broader interests of the nation. In such cases, running as an independent candidate may be seen as a way to restore a sense of democratic accountability within the party itself.

It is crucial to remember that democracy is not just about elections; it's about the continuous participation of citizens in the political process. Loyalty to a political party should not be blind, but rather rooted in shared values, principles, and a commitment to the betterment of the country. When a party strays from these ideals, individuals like Alan Kyerematen may choose to take a stand for the greater good.

In conclusion, Alan Kyerematen's decision to run as an independent candidate serves as a reminder that our loyalty should ultimately be to our country and its well-being. When a political party deviates from democratic principles or fails to serve the nation's interests, it is not only the right but also the responsibility of individuals to consider alternative paths. This is not a rejection of party politics but a call for parties to uphold the principles of democracy, accountability, and representation. In the end, the strength of a democracy lies in its ability to adapt, evolve, and ensure that the voices of its citizens are heard and respected, even when they choose to stand apart from the party line.