Source: Peacefmonline.com
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
Featured Video
NDC again is wrong seeking misapplication of rules and laws from Abdulai SC ruling. 1. SC declared in Abdulai interpretation that standing orders of Parliament must agree with constitution. 2. Parliament is still the master of its own proceedings. It was not the SC duty to count who was in the house and who was not in the house. 3. It was also not the duty of the SC to take over the role of parliament to supervise and demand the quorum of its sittings. What are MPs paid for? The SC to do their work for them?. The SC is called to intervene to interprets the constitution . Parliament must still do its own nitty gritty. 3. The Parliament has the procedure to challenge and determine whether there is quorum and when and where and how to do that challenge. The SC has not taken over parliament to temper with the procedure. 4. Abdulai SC case sought to clarify who constitute a quorum of the parliament. 5. NDC is confused. It has no case. What do they want from SC? When to determine a quorum, or where to determine a quorum or how to determine a quorum? This is Parliamentary business which Abdulai case changed nothing from it. Abdulai case addressed who constitute a quorum. 6. NDC is in the wrong place if they want amendments about when, where, and how to determine a quorum . This is parliamentary work. SC will come in only when it is done wrong and the SC is invoked. But that is too late for E- Levy.