<<Print>>“The true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its most vulnerable members” – Mahatma Gandhi, Indian lawyer, anti-colonial nationalist and political ethicist.
Africa is well endowed when it comes to human and natural resources but then again Africa is behind in major development metrics. The key to resolving this mystery is not far-fetched; it lies in the failure of managers of affairs on the continent to adequately translate the abundant resources into visible prosperity.
For the avoidance of doubt, conservative estimates by United Nations (UN) agencies suggest that the continent is home to more than 60 percent of the world’s arable landmass; the second largest and longest rivers (the Nile and the Congo); and its second-largest tropical forest.
As of 2016, the African Development Bank (AfDB) estimated that the total value added by the continent's fisheries and aquaculture sector alone is estimated at US$ 24 billion. In addition, it holds about 30 percent of all global mineral reserves and perhaps, most importantly, the youngest population in the world, with approximately 70 percent of sub-Saharan Africa under the age of 30.
Yet, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of its 1.3 billion people (2020 estimates) is US$2.7 trillion, which is US$246 billion less than France's GDP, the 7th largest economy in the world. For additional context, the European Union’s 447.7 million inhabitants command a GDP of about US$17.9 trillion (2020 estimates).
Human Development – The Ghanaian case
Again, the reason for these sober figures is not rocket science, it is found in the neglect of value addition to resources and as the world approaches a new wave of industrialisation, human resources is set to become the most important asset of any society. With this in mind, how a nation develops its human capital has become the determining factor for its long-term viability.
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a statistic developed in 1990 and compiled by the United Nations to measure various countries’ levels of social and economic development. It was established to place emphasis on the opportunities individuals require to lead dignified lives.
As a summary measure for assessing long-term progress, it takes into consideration three basic dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge and a decent standard of living. Long and healthy life is measured by life expectancy.
Between 1990 and 2019, the UN notes, Ghana’s HDI value increased from 0.465 to 0.611, an increase of 31.4 percent, and puts Ghana in the medium human development category. As impressive as this sounds, however, for 2019, Ghana ranks 138 out of 189 countries and territories: a telling figure.
Social Protection
HDI is a key framework for social protection, which the UN describes succinctly as: “Social protection systems help individuals and families, especially the poor and vulnerable, cope with crises and shocks, find jobs, improve productivity, invest in the health and education of their children, and protect the ageing population. Social protection programs are at the heart of boosting human capital for the world’s most vulnerable.”
Since independence, the nation has initiated a number of stop-start social protection measures, with much of the social protection framework operated by traditional, family, faith and welfare-based institutions.
A National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) was developed in 2007 and revised in 2012. A Social Protection Rationalisation Study conducted in 2013 established the need for a holistic National Social Protection Policy.
Subsequently, the Ghana National Social Protection Policy (GNSPP) was introduced in 2015 and identified five flagship programmes – the Capitation Grant, Labour Intensive Public Works (LIPW), National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), Ghana School Feeding Programme (GSFP) and the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP).
These programmes have shown some positive impact in three key areas for households – income, education and health, consistent with the focus of the HDI framework.
Assessment of the true impact of these programmes, however, have been initiated by the supply-side – the government, with minimal input from the demand-side – direct beneficiaries, their agents and relevant civil society organisation.
This gap informed the commissioning of a Mirror Report by the Civil Society Partnership on Social Accountability for Social Protection, aggregating citizen assessments of these key interventions.
According to the Partnership, “The purpose of the Mirror Report is to provide a complimentary report to the official government report on social protection delivery with the view to promote mutual accountability on the implementation of social protection interventions… to reflect citizens’ experiences of services and identify critical issues for achieving social protection as a right.”