The Attorney General is asking the Supreme Court to dismiss a case filed by the Bolga East Member of Parliament Dr Dominic Ayine which sought to annul the appointment of Martin Amidu as Special Prosecutor.
In the statement of case filed by the Attorney General's Department, the Deputy Attorney General Godfred Dame avers the Special Prosecutor is not subject to the retiring age of the public servant and cannot, therefore, be disappointed under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Ayine in a suit prayed the Supreme Court to annul the appointment of Amidu arguing the appointee is beyond the statutory age of a public servant.
At 66, Ayine said the appointee is too old to take up the appointment which was meant for public servants at age 65 or below.
"By true and proper interpretation of Articles 190(1) (d) and 199 (4) of the 1992 Constitution, no person above the age of 65 years is eligible for employment in any public office created under Article 190(1) (d)," part of his statement of case averred.
He argued further that the appointment of Amidu as Special Prosecutor was unconstitutional and must be declared null and void even if Parliament went ahead to approve him.
He said by nominating Martin Amidu, and offering him for vetting and approval by Parliament, both the President and the Attorney General “have violated Article 199(1) of the Constitution. If Parliament proceeds to approve his appointment, it would also be acting unconstitutionally.”
Amidu has since been vetted, approved and sworn into office by the president and is expected to start work this week.
The Attorney General is convinced government did not err in the appointment of Amidu and has proceeded with a vehement defence contained in a statement of case.
“We submit that the facts of the instant case are clearly different. The Special Prosecutor is not appointed pursuant to article 195. Neither is he subject to the retiring age of a public servant under article 199,” the rebuttal said in part.
Godfred Yeboah Dame argued further the suit filed is “borne out of a narrow, inadequate and literal construction” of the constitution.
In the 41-page document, the Deputy AG said Martin Amidu is a wrong person to sue because the decision to appoint him was taken by the AG and the President “in the course of [their] official duties.”
Quoting several authorities including the Appiah-Ofori V Attorney General, Brown V Attorney General (Audit Service case) the AG prayed the court to dismiss the case filed by Ayine.
It is not clear yet when the case will be heard.
Videos-
Source: JFM/Ghana
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
When big minds are at work little minds run to the courts to have themselves disgraced.
BETWEEN 2001 TO DATE NPP ONLY STRIVES ON TECHNICALITIES AND SUPPORT OF THEIR THIEEF JUSTICE TO WIN CASES BUT NOT THE SUBSTANCE OR PROPERLY ARGUED CASES. THAT IS WHY THEY ALWAYS WANTED TO APPOINT THE CHIEF JUSTICE. NOW THEY WANT TO APPOINT THE ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER.
I admire Lawyer Dame's legal brain,it's too deep. Godfred is simply brilliant!I was elated when he was appointed deputy AG because I knew he's excellent.May God keep protecting and blessing him.
A country is ruled by law and not by word of mouth. These cases will eventually help stream line our democracy.
I trust the AG and believe they will prevail. The public jubilation that has characterised the nomination, appointment, acceptance, vetting and the final swearing in of Mr. Amidu as the first Special Prosecutor (SP) is phenomenal and unprecedented. It has immediately restored hope and confidence in the average Ghanaian that all is not lost to the fight against the canker of corruption. What therefore baffles some of us is why some people in parliament and political positions who are supposed to show good example in governance are rather against this noble development! I in particular am elated that the AG has taken this resolute and appropriate stance. After all, since the election petition no legal battle has been witnessed in the country. Still the battle is the Lord's.