The Supreme Court has acquitted and discharged a 36-year-old man who was wrongfully jailed for defiling and impregnating a 14-year-old student.
This was after a DNA test carried out on the child (now 12 years) believed to be the result of the defilement proved that Asante was not the father.
In September 2005, Asante was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment with hard labour by the Tamale High Court after he was found guilty of defiling and impregnating the student, Rubamatu Mohammed.
He was however released from prison in September 2015 based on good conduct after serving two thirds of his jail term at the Nsawam Medium Security Prisons.
Acquitted and discharged
In a ruling Thursday, the Supreme Court held that a new DNA evidence had proven that Asante was not responsible for the pregnancy. In view of this, the court held that Asante's conviction by the High Court was not supported by any substantial evidence.
Asante's victory followed an intervention by the Graphic Communications Group Limited (GCGL), who approached human rights lawyer, Francis Xavier Sosu to intervene in the matter. The GCGL paid the legal and filling fees throughout the case.
Background
On September 5, 2005, a Tamale High Court sentenced Asante to 15 years imprisonment with hard labour after the court found him guilty of defiling one Rubamatu Mohammed, which led to the birth of the child. Asante, who had consistently maintained his innocence, in October 2006 appealed against his conviction but that appeal was dismissed.
In 2012, he went to the Supreme Court and the court granted him leave to file a notice of appeal against his conviction. The notice of appeal was followed by an application for an order for the conduct of a DNA test on the child. The Supreme Court accepted the application and accordingly ordered Rubamatu to make her child available for the DNA test initially at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.
The court order was served and received on Rubamatu's behalf by her aunts, Juliet Tinjina and Gladys Abokokpa, who were then taking care of Rubamatu's child in Tamale. Although the court gave eight weeks within which the test should be conducted, the family refused to bring the child to Accra as ordered by the court.
Following the intransigence of the child’s family, the Supreme Court on February 11, 2015 further ordered Juliet Tinjina and Gladys Abokokpa to make the child, who was under their care, available for the DNA test, this time at the Police Forensic Unit.
Summarising the report from the Forensic Laboratory of the Police Hospital at the court’s sitting on November 17, 2015, the judge said the result of the test excluded Mr Asante of having any biological relations with the 10-year-old boy who was alleged to be the outcome of the defilement.
Source: Daily Graphic
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
I think that Ghc10 million is even a meager amount as compared to the pain and shame he's been put through. I would not be asking for only 10 million, if i were a lawyer and if he was my client.
Massa please file a law suit against the state and the child's mother for the wrongful imprisonment. There is no free lunch. Thanks
A lot of teachers have been wrongfully accused by demonized girls who just want to destroy the carriers of great teachers. I have heard several of these cases where the teachers plead innocent but ended up in jail. However, there are some teachers who actually did it and deserve to be punished without impunity.
So does the Ghana government still send samples to South Africa for DNA testing?
Asante must be compensated for dis unlawful imprisonment. But this girl should equally be jailed for the harm caused Asante. Asante! U've been vindicated n the Lord restores all what you've lost all these years.
Me, or whatever your name is, please don't argue blindly as you always do. The court based the judgement on the charge previously prefered against Asante. He was accused to have raped the lady when the pregnancy was discovered. The evidence is therefore the child that came out of the pregnancy.
Good Justice has been done albeit too late but what happens to the wrong accusers to deter people from making false accusations.
The paternity test (DNA) cannot be an exonerating factor for Mr Asante. Unless a DNA was conducted on the semen or other fluids that could have been found on the victim at the time the incident happened, otherwise it is not conclusive.
Ah my brother this is not fair to you! I am very sad. But God has proved to you He is faithful, serve Him well.
The guy should sue for compensation.Big time!