The Member of Parliament for Tamale North, Alhassan Suhuyini, has challenged the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission (EC), Mrs Jean Mensa, to mount the witness box just as her predecessor Dr Kwafwo Afari-Gyan did in the 2012 election petition.
“The argument of whether the EC boss should get into the box shouldn’t have happened. When Afari-Gyan’s last election was challenged, he went into the witness box to clear any doubt people may have about the EC,” the former broadcaster told GHone TV Wednesday.
The Supreme Court will on Thursday rule if the EC boss should mount the witness box.
Lawyers of the 1st Respondent, Justin Amenuvor, said the Petitioner has not made any case as far as the petition is concerned and therefore wishes to wave the rights to call any witness, though Mrs Mensa, Chairperson of the EC, had had a witness statement filed on her behalf.
Akoto Ampaw, counsel for the 2nd Respondent also argued that the witness Statement filed has not been tendered and will not be relied on.
However, Mr Tsikata, making his legal submission, said the matter before the court was not a normal civil trial but rather an election petition with different characteristics.
Mr Tsikata argued that what the clear interest of justice requires is not for the Chairperson of the EC to evade cross-examination.
Source: adomonline.com
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
I do not think she should be made to mount the witness box. If you listen to the responses of the petitioner's witnesses, this case is a fiasco. I believe NDC is out to just discredit the EC by making propaganda noise. They should NOT be afforded that opportunity. EC did their work. There were errors in her declarations and she corrected them...that does not change the figures. NDC should have shown us tangle figures of mistakes that can really affect the results of 500,000 vote differences. They failed to do that. Why should they be given further opportunity to mess around with the EC boss for fun sake. I think they have no case.